Facebook's WhatsApp has added a much-needed privacy feature: disappearing messages. But it seems that the company has a slightly odd idea of what this feature is for.
In a blog post Thursday, WhatsApp introduced the new feature, saying the company's goal is to "make conversations on WhatsApp feel as close to in-person as possible, which means they shouldn't have to stick around forever."
Now, users can turn the feature on for one-to-one chats, and new messages sent to a chat will disappear after seven days. In groups, only admins will be able to set the feature to on or off.
Typically, such a feature has more granular options. For example, in chat app Signal, you can set messages to disappear after five, 10, or 30 seconds, one, five, or 30 minutes, and so forth — all the way up to one week. That way, if you really need privacy, you can have your messages disappear very fast. A seven-day period for disappearing messages is better than nothing, but wouldn't exactly give me peace of mind that my conversations are truly private.
SEE ALSO: Best parental control apps for monitoring your kid's activity on Android devicesWhatsApp has offered some explanation as to why it designed the feature the way it did. "We’re starting with seven days because we think it offers peace of mind that conversations aren’t permanent, while remaining practical so you don’t forget what you were chatting about," the blog post said. This is fine, but still doesn't exactly explain why more options aren't available. I've asked a Facebook rep about this, and will update the post when I hear back.
UPDATE: Nov. 5, 2020, 2:24 p.m. CET Here's the answer I got from Facebook:
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
The feature will be rolling out globally "this month."
Copyright © 2023 Powered by
WhatsApp now has disappearing messages, but there's a catch-蜻蜓点水网
sitemap
文章
28595
浏览
6977
获赞
419
Shop Kindle books on April 1 and receive double rewards points
EARN DOUBLE POINTS:On April 1, enjoy double rewards on all Kindle book purchases. Shop deals and newWhat Apple’s new in
Apple may have released four new iPhones this fall, but Tim Cook isn't done flooding homes with hardHow the 12
"This is a little strange, I am sure," began the letter Jessi Zahm, of Newberg, Oregon, found on herEcho vs. Nest Audio vs. HomePod mini: Which smart speaker is the best?
There's team Alexa, team Siri, and team Google Assistant. Which one are you?If you're confused aboutJust a great white on the beach, nothing to see here
Going for a cheeky afternoon dip proved a little difficult for folks in Sydney on Monday, due to a cHow big porn sites convert viewers into workers
The big porn streaming platforms might offer what seems to be a great public service, giving viewersSamsung's 110
If you really hate bezels, and OLED just doesn't cut it in terms of picture quality, we've got goodHow to screenshot on Mac
Whether you want to save your receipts or share a bizarre targeted adwith the group text, there areFEMA's debunking Harvey rumors, but there's more to know
Disasters seem to breed all types of rumors, tricks and scams, and Tropical Storm Harvey is no excepFacebook pauses groups recommendation feature until after election
Don't worry, militia members will have to wait until afterElection Day to be algorithmically pointedHenry Golding reads the first of Calm's Roald Dahl sleep stories
Meditation app Calm is delving into a beloved realm of storytelling, launching a multi-year collaborThe digital privacy wins to celebrate in an otherwise dreary 2020
Let's talk about the good things that happened this year. Yes, 2020 has been a relentless nightmareWaymo partners with AutoNation to provide service support for driverless cars
Waymo is one of the biggest players in the self-driving development race, but it's not equipped to sWhy do some people cry after sex?
Whenever 26-year-old animation student Amber* has sex with another person, she cries. "Sometimes it&Mitch McConnell dildo on sale by sex toy company Dame
The Supreme Court overruled Roe v. Wadein June, upending the precedent of the right to privacy and a